DUI & Boating

Boating Under the Influence in Ohio (BUI)

March 25th, 2011
A NYPD boat

Boating Under the Influence is illegal in Ohio. 2001 Sub. S.B. 123, eff. 1-1-04 sought to unify the drunk driving provisions with Ohio’s boating laws.   O.R.C. 1547.11(A)(1)  to O.R.C. 1547.11(A)(6) prohibit a person from operating or being in physical control of a vessel underway or manipulating water skis, aquaplanes, or similar devices while under the influence of alcohol or drugs.

O.R.C. 1547.11(A)(1) is the impairment provision of the law, preventing operation or physical control while under the influence.  The law also has a provision preventing operation with a prohibited level of alcohol which it sets at the same prohibited level (.08) as the DUI/OVI law Unlike the DUI/OVI law, there are no high-tier provisions which apply to boating. A third section of the law prohibits operation or physical control with a concentration of certain controlled substances (marijuana, cocaine, amphetamine, et al.) or metabolites of the same.  This section of the law is identical to the DUI-drug provisions found in O.R.C. 4511.19(A)(1)(j).

Subsequent amendments to the law, 2007 Am. Sub. S.B. 17, eff. 9-30-08, allows for forced blood draws for persons with two or BUI offenses.  A BUI offense can be used to enhance a subsequent DUI/OVI  offense. O.R.C. 4511.181(A)(6)-(7).  Some important differences in Ohio’s BUI law, stem from the fact that Ohio does not require an operator’s license to operate a watercraft.  Therefore, no administrative license suspension provisions are in the law.  Instead, the chief of the Division of Watercraft gives written notice that you are prevented from operating or being in physical control of a watercraft (or from registering a watercraft) for one year from the date of the alleged violation.  Another key difference is that a fourth or subsequent BUI offense is not subject to felony enhancement.

Penalties for Boating Under the Influence offenses are set forth at O.R.C. 1547.99 and are similar to those provided for DUI/OVI offensesBoating Under the Influence is a first degree misdemeanor and is subject to a minimum 3-day jail sentence and a maximum 6 months in jail.  The 3-day jail sentence can be served in a qualified driver intervention program.  The minimum mandatory fine for a first BUI offense is $150.  A second offense within 6 years carries a mandatory 10 day jail sentence, but the minimum mandatory fine is still $150.  A third offense requires a minimum of 30 days in jail.  NOTE: The Ohio legislature is constantly “tweaking” the Ohio DUI and BUI laws, so please check with an attorney as these laws may have changed. This posting was written on 9-24-10.

Contact Charles Rowland by phone at 937-318-1DUI (937-318-1384), 937-879-9542, or toll-free at 1-888-ROWLAND (1-888-769-5263). For after-hours help contact our 24/7 DUI HOTLINE at 937-776-2671.For information about Dayton DUI sent directly to your mobile device, text DaytonDUI (one word) to 50500.  Follow DaytonDUI on Twitter at www.Twitter.com/DaytonDUI or Get Twitter updates via SMS by texting follow DaytonDUI to 40404. DaytonDUI is also available on Facebook and you can access updates by becoming a fan of Dayton DUI/OVI Defense.  You can also email Charles Rowland at: CharlesRowland@CharlesRowland.com or write to us at 2190 Gateway Dr., Fairborn, Ohio 45324.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Blood & Urine Specimens O.A.C. 3701-53-05

December 16th, 2010
Arm venipuncture prior to fililng a vacutainer.
Image via Wikipedia

Ohio Administrative Code section 3701-53-05 applies to the collection of blood and urine specimens.  Section (A) requires all samples to be “collected in accordance with section 4511.19 (DUI statute), or section 1547.11 (Boating Under the Influence) of the Revised Code, as applicable.”

Section (B) states, “[w]hen collecting a blood sample, an aqueous solution of non-volatile antiseptic shall be used on the skin.  No alcohols shall be used as a skin antiseptic.”  A good place to start your DUI investigation is the first blood draw.  We have garnered the help of a legal-nurse-practitioner to find instances where wounds could have been treated in such a manner that alcohol was left on the skin.  We also fight hard to get the blood draw protocol from the hospital.  Often arguments can be made that the skin antiseptic does not meet the requirements of this administrative code.

Section (C) requires that, “[b]lood shall be drawn with a sterile dry needle into a vacuum container with a solid anticoagulant, or according to the laboratory protocol as written in the laboratory procedure manual based on the type of specimen being tested.”  Again, fight hard for the laboratory protocol and procedure manual so that you can see if the blood draw was done correctly.  You will often find important differences in how the nurse drew the blood and the way the OAC contemplates a blood draw.  Hire an attorney who knows what the guidelines are and can fight your case.

Section (D) sets forth the manner in which a urine sample can be collected.  “The collection of a urine specimen must be witnessed to assure that the sample can be authenticated.  Urine shall be deposited into a clean glass or plastic screw top container which shall be capped, or collected according to the laboratory protocol as written in the laboratory procedure manual.  Here, recent changes in the HIPPA privacy laws may have caused a change in the hosptial/laboratory protocol that will benefit your client.  Thorough discovery is required.  Often, you will be able to get this type of information only by getting it yourself.  More and more often, courts will allow you to raise these issues only if the prosecutor has been put on notice of a deficiency.

Section (E) describes what must be done to assure no tampering with the sample has occurred and section (F) requires that “[w]hile not in transit or under examination, all blood and urine specimens shall be refrigerated.”

Contact Charles Rowland by phone at 937-318-1DUI (937-318-1384), 937-879-9542, or toll-free at 1-888-ROWLAND (1-888-769-5263).

For after-hours help contact our 24/7 DUI HOTLINE at 937-776-2671.

Visit www.DaytonDUI.com, www.SpringfieldDUI.com, www.OhioDUIdefense.com, www.KetteringDUI.com, www.BeavercreekDUI.com, www.FairbornDUI.com,  www.VandaliaDUI.com, www.HuberHeightsDUI.comwww.MiamisburgDUI.com, www.XeniaDUI.com or www.CharlesRowland.com.  Immediate help is available by filling out the CONTACT form on any of these pages.

For information about Dayton DUI sent directly to your mobile device, text DaytonDUI (one word) to 50500.  Follow DaytonDUI on Twitter at www.Twitter.com/DaytonDUI or Get Twitter updates via SMS by texting follow DaytonDUI to 40404. DaytonDUI is also available on Facebook and you can access updates by becoming a fan of Dayton DUI/OVI Defense.

You can also email Charles Rowland at: CharlesRowland@CharlesRowland.com or write to us at 2190 Gateway Dr., Fairborn, Ohio 45324.

Enhanced by Zemanta

O.A.C. 3701-53-02, Approved Evidential Breath Testing Instruments

December 9th, 2010
Coin operated talking breathalyzer
Image by frippy via Flickr

Ohio Administrative Code 3701-53-02(A) sets forth the approved instruments for evidential breath testing in Ohio.  It states,

(A) The instruments listed in this paragraph are approved as evidential breath testing instruments for use in determining whether a person’s breath contains a concentration of alcohol prohibited or defined by sections 4511.19 and/or 1547.11 of the Revised Code, or any other equivalent statute or local ordinance prescribing a defined or prohibited breath-alcohol concentration. The approved evidential breath testing instruments are:

  1. BAC DataMaster, BAC DataMaster K, BAC DataMaster cdm;
  2. Intoxilyzer model 5000 series 66, 68 and 68 EN; and
  3. Intoxilyzer model 8000 (OH-5).

O.A.C. 3701-53-02(B) lists the approved testing instrument for violations of  R.C. 1547.11, Ohio’s prohibition against boating while intoxicated.  O.R.C. 1547.11(A)(1)  to O.R.C. 1547.11(A)(6) prohibit a person from operating or being in physical control of a vessel underway or manipulating water skis, aquaplanes, or similar devices while under the influence of alcohol or drugs.  Only the Intoxilyzer 8000 has been approved pursuant to this section.  Section (B) states,

(B) The instruments listed in this paragraph are approved as additional evidential breath testing instruments for use in determining whether a person’s breath contains a concentration of alcohol prohibited or defined by section 1547.11 of the Revised Code, or any other equivalent statute or local ordinance prescribing a defined or prohibited breath alcohol concentration. The approved evidential breath testing instrument is:

  1. Intoxilyzer model 8000 (OH-2).

O.A.C. 3701-53-02(C) limits breath testing to deep lung or alveolar air samples.  This section can be used by skilled attorneys to show that the sample given was not deep lung alveolar air, but was contaminated with residual mouth alcohol.  Using this type of a defense will require an experienced attorney and a competent expert witness.  Section (C) states,

(C) Breath samples of deep lung (alveolar) air shall be analyzed for purposes of determining whether a person has a prohibited breath alcohol concentration with instruments approved under paragraphs (A) and (B) of this rule.

O.A.C. 3701-53-02(D) and (E) incorporate the manufacturers’ recommendations on use of the breath testing machines and place the burden of adopting procedure on the Director of Health.  These sections provide as follows,

(D) Breath samples using instruments listed under paragraphs (A)(1), (A)(2) and (B) of this rule shall be analyzed according to the operational checklist for the instrument being used and checklist forms recording the results of subject tests shall be retained in accordance with paragraph (A) of rule 3701-53-01 of the Administrative Code. The results shall be recorded on forms prescribed by the director of health. (E) Breath samples using the instrument listed under paragraph (A)(3) of this rule shall be analyzed according to the instrument display for the instrument being used. The results of subject tests shall be retained in a manner prescribed by the director of health and shall be retained in accordance with paragraph (A) of rule 3701-53-01 of the Administrative Code.

CONTACT US VIA ANY METHOD PROVIDED BELOW! Visit www.DaytonDUI.comwww.SpringfieldDUI.com,www.OhioDUIdefense.comwww.KetteringDUI.com,www.BeavercreekDUI.comwww.FairbornDUI.com,  www.VandaliaDUI.com,www.HuberHeightsDUI.comwww.MiamisburgDUI.comwww.XeniaDUI.com orwww.CharlesRowland.com.  Immediate help is available by filling out the CONTACT form on any of these pages.  For information about Dayton DUI sent directly to your mobile device, text DaytonDUI (one word) to 50500.  Follow DaytonDUI on Twitter at www.Twitter.com/DaytonDUI or Get Twitterupdates via SMS by texting follow DaytonDUI to 40404. DaytonDUI is also available on Facebook and you can access updates by becoming a fan of Dayton DUI/OVI Defense.  You can also email Charles Rowland at: CharlesRowland@CharlesRowland.com or write to us at 2190 Gateway Dr., Fairborn, Ohio 45324. Contact Charles Rowland by phone at 937-318-1DUI (937-318-1384), 937-879-9542, or toll-free at 1-888-ROWLAND (1-888-769-5263). For after-hours help contact our 24/7 DUI HOTLINE at (937) 776-2671.

Forced Blood Draws…in America?

October 20th, 2010
blood, human, splatter, drops
Image via Wikipedia

Ohio Revised Code Section 4511.191(A)(5) allows forced blood draws.  Officers may use “whatever reasonable means are necessary to ensure that the person submits to a chemical test of the person’s whole blood or blood serum or plasma.”  This section applies to persons who have two prior convictions.  O.R.C. 1547.111(B) applies the “whatever means necessary” test to watercraft.

Ohio Revised Code 4511.191(A)(4) authorizes the State to withdraw blood from a corpse or from a person who is unconscious or from a person who is incapable of withholding consent.

Ohio Revised Code 4511.19(D)(1)(b) provides that courts may admit blood evidence upon consent of the tested “or a blood or urine sample…obtained pursuant to warrant.”

Let Charles Rowland help with your blood draw case!

Charles M. Rowland II has successfully suppressed blood draws at motions to suppress and will aggressively fight your blood, breath or urine test.  Contact DUI/OVI attorney Charles M. Rowland II at 937-318-1DUI (318-1384), 1-888-ROWLAND (888-769-5263).  Ohio OVI attorney Charles M. Rowland limits his practice to DUI defense and regularly appears in courts throughout the Miami Valley.  If you have a blood evidence case in Xenia, Beavercreek, Fairborn, Miamisburg, Centerville, Oakwood, Kettering, Vandalia, Huber Heights, Springfield or Dayton, call today.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Portable Breath Test Devices Can Produce Falsely High Tests

September 28th, 2010

According to the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration (Student Manual HS178 R2/06), a Portable Breath Test Device may produce an artificially high reading.  The government document is clear: “PBT instruments have accuracy limitations.” (VII-8).  The NHTSA manual goes on to set forth “two common factors that tend to produce high results on a PBT.  The PBT is often seen in Underage Consumption cases and in Boating Under the Influence (BUI) cases as they provide probable cause for an arrest.

Residual mouth alcohol. After a person takes a drink, some of the alcohol will remain in the mouth tissues.  If the person exhales soon after drinking, the breath sample will pick up some of this left-over mouth alcohol.  In this case, the breath sample will contain an additional amount of alcohol and the test result will be higher than the true BAC.

It takes approximately 15 minutes for the residual alcohol to evaporate from the mouth.

The only sure way to eliminate this factor is to make sure the suspect does not take any alcohol for at least 15 to 20 minutes before conducting a breath test.  Remember, too, that most mouthwashes, breath sprays, cough syrups, etc., contain alcohol and will produce residual mouth alcohol.  Therefore, it at least 15 to 20 minutes prior to testing.

Breath Contaminants. Some types of preliminary breath tests might react to certain substances other than alcohol.  For example, substances such as ether, chloroform, acetone, acetaldehyde and cigarette smoke conceivably could produce a positive reaction on certain devices.  If so, the test would be contaminated and its result would be higher than the true BAC. Normal characteristics of breath samples, such as halitosis, food odors, etc., do not affect accuracy.

If you are stopped on suspicion of drunk driving anywhere in the Miami Valley, Dayton DUI lawyer Charles M. Rowland II has the credentials to fight your case.  Contact Dayton OVI lawyer Charles Rowland by calling 937-318-1DUI (318-1384), 1-888-ROWLAND (888-769-5263), by texting DaytonDUI (one word) to 50500 or by “liking” Dayton DUI/OVI Defense on Facebook or @DaytonDUI on Twitter.  Charles Rowland says, “All I do is DUI.”

Enhanced by Zemanta