DUI & Driving Privileges

Driving Privileges: Hard Time

May 8th, 2013

15 days if you took the test, 30 days if you did not (First Offense)

Seal of the Ohio Bureau of Motor Vehicles Source

If you are stopped for an OVI, DUI or drunk driving and you refuse to take a chemical test (breath, blood or urine), or if your test results exceed the legal limit of Blood Alcohol Concentration (BAC), the police officer can and will take your driver’s license on the spot causing your drivers license to be suspended immediately.  This pre-conviction suspension is called the ADMINISTRATIVE LICENSE SUSPENSION. The ALS is a suspension imposed by the Ohio Bureau of Motor Vehicles and not a suspension imposed by the court.  A court may not grant driving privileges for a certain period of time following the imposition of an ALS. O.R.C. 4510.13(A).  The amount of time between the imposition of the ALS suspension and the time you are eligible for limited driving privileges is called “hard time.”  How long the hard time lasts depends upon whether the person has any prior offenses and whether or not the person took the test or refused the test.

First Offense Midemeanor OVI Failed Chemical Test R.C. 4511.191(C): Occupational driving privileges cannot be granted during the following periods in test cases:

  • First 15 days of suspension on a first offense
  • First 30 days of suspension on a person who had a prior OVI or refusal within 6 years.
  • First 180 days for a person who has had 2 prior OVI/refusals within 6 years.
  • First 3 years of suspension on a person who had 3 or more previous OVI/refusals within 6 years

First Offense Misdemeanor OVI Refusal R.C. 4511.19(B): Occupational driving privileges cannot be granted during the following periods in refusal cases:

  • First 30 days of suspension on a first offense.
  • First 90 days of suspension on a person who had a previous refusal within 6 years.
  • First year of suspension on a person who had 2 previous refusals within 6 years.
  • First 3 years of suspension on a person who had 3 previous refusals within 6 years.
  • A person, who within the preceding 7 years, has been convicted of or pleaded guilty to 3 or more OVI violations cannot be granted limited privileges.

One of the first conversations you should have with your OVI lawyer will involve wether or not grounds exist for an appeal of the ALS.  You will discuss the limited circumstances under which an Administrative License Suspension can be challenged.  The court must hold the administrative license suspension hearing within five days of arrest.  You only have 30 days from your arraignment to file an appeal of the Administrative License Suspension. The scope of appeal is confined to four issues:

 1. Was your arrest based on reasonable grounds? 

2. Did the officer request that you to take a test? 

3. Were you made aware of the consequences if you refused or failed the test? 

4. Did you refuse or fail the test?

Charles M. Rowland II is familiar with the case law relevant to determining if an ALS appeal would be beneficial in your case.  He will check to see if the 2255 form (the yellow piece of paper you were given) was notorized.  The BMV must receive a notarized sworn copy of the 2255.  If the form is not executed as required by law, then he can bring that to the court’s attention and request that the ALS be terminated or stayed.  It is important to discuss whether or not you were able to produce the requested sample.  If you have a verifiable medical condition the Administrative License Suspension may not be plausible in your case.  No matter what the circumstances, Charles M. Rowland II will help secure you limited driving privileges for work or for school after the HARD TIME has passed.

Much confusion is caused by the fact that the Administrative License Suspension is a pre-trial suspension generated by the Ohio Bureau of Motor Vehicles.  The warnings given by the arresting officer are misleading.  Often a client will come to our office under the misimpression that the worst case scenario will be a 90 day suspension.  If our client refused a chemical test, they believe they are condemned to a one year suspension.  This is not usually the case.  Upon a plea to a reduced charge (such as Reckless Operation) or to an OVI,  the Administrative License Suspension will be terminated and the court will impose its own suspension.   The minimum mandatory suspension for a first OVI offense is six months.  This will horrify the person who believed that they were facing 90 days, but a welcome relief to people who thought they were going to have a one year suspension.

According to the Ohio BMV, the ALS Refusal Suspension will be terminated by the registrar upon notice that:

  • The person entered a plea of guilty to OVI and the refusal suspension arose from the same incident.
  • The person entered a plea of no contest to OVI, was found guilty and the refusal suspension arose from the same incident.

To make matters even more confusing, any suspension ordered by the Court is given a “class” numerical representation and any suspension given by the Ohio Bureau of Motor Vehicles is given a “letter” designation.  Here are the lists of the different “CLASSES” of suspensions in Ohio. See R.C. 4510.02(A) and R.C. 4510.02(B).

COURT SUSPENSIONS

  • Class 1: Lifetime
  • Class 2: 3yrs to life
  • Class 3: 2 – 10yrs
  • Class 4: 1 – 5yrs
  • Class 5: 6mos. – 3yrs.
  • Class 6: 3mos – 2yrs.
  • Class 7: “a definite period” – 1yr

BMV SUSPENSIONS (Note: all for a fixed length)

  • Class A: 3 yrs
  • Class B: 2 yrs
  • Class C: 1 yr
  • Class D: 6 mos
  • Class E: 3 mos
  • Class F: until conditions are met

It is advisable that you speak with Charles Rowland at the imposition of your suspension as many courts offer programs (at little or no cost) that help you get valid.  DUI attorney Charles M. Rowland II dedicates his practice to defending the accused drunk driver in Fairborn, Dayton, SpringfieldKetteringVandaliaXeniaMiamisburgHuber HeightsBeavercreekCentervilleSpringboro, Franklin and throughout Ohio.  He has the credentials and the experience to win your case and has made himself the Miami Valley’s choice for DUI defense.  Contact Charles Rowland by phone at 937-318-1DUI (937-318-1384), 937-879-9542, or toll-free at 1-888-ROWLAND (888-769-5263).  For after-hours help contact our 24/7 DUI HOTLINE at 937-776-2671.  For information about Dayton DUI sent directly to your mobile device, text DaytonDUI (one word) to 50500.  Follow DaytonDUI on Twitter @DaytonDUI or Get Twitterupdates via SMS by texting DaytonDUI to 40404. DaytonDUI is also available on Facebook,www.facebook.com/daytondui and on the DaytonDUI channel on YouTube.  You can also email Charles Rowland at: CharlesRowland@DaytonDUI.com or write to us at 2190 Gateway Dr., Fairborn, Ohio 45324.

Drivers License Taken Because of DUI?

March 28th, 2013

QUESTION: If somebody hires you, can you help them get their license back if it has been taken?

AUDIO ANSWER by DUI Attorney Charles Rowland:

Driving Privileges: Can A Court Prevent Me From Drinking?

February 20th, 2013

English: AMS2000 Ignition Interlock Device man...

A trial court is vested with a great amount of discretion in issuing limited driving privileges under an Administrative License Suspension.  A court may require, as a condition of allowing you to have pre-trial limited driving privileges, that you abstain from the use of alcohol.  The issuing court also has the discretion to order you to put bright yellow, shame-plates on your car and can order you to wear a transdermal alcohol detection unit (commonly called the S.C.R.A.M., “Secure Continuous Remote Alcohol Monitor”).  What is more, the court will make you pay for the installation and monitoring of the device.  If the court imposes such restrictions, they will remain in effect until the conclusion of your case. R.C. 4511.198(A)(1).  Violations of the alcohol monitoring will result in a termination of the court’s driving privileges.  In practice, your OVI attorney will be able to advise you about the peculiarities of the court and the possibility of obtaining limited driving privileges with or without the restrictions.

Driving under an OVI suspension is a violation of Ohio Revised Code 4510.14.  It is a separate offense from a DUI/OVI charge and carries harsh mandatory penalties.  Most of these charges originate when a person is desperate to live up to their obligations to their work and/or their family.  Often, the automatic license suspension is the worst part of the DUI experience.  It is the position of this author that taking a person’s license prior to being found guilty of an offense is an unconstitutional governmental taking, a violation of the First Amendment’s guarantee of the right of assembly and a violation of Due Process in that a person is to be presumed innocent until proven guilty.  Thus far, these arguments have not carried the day.  Here are the punishments for the various levels of the offense.

FIRST OFFENSE.  A first offense violation of R.C. 4510.14 is a first degree misdemeanor (punishable by a maximum fine of six months in jail and a $1,000.00 fine).  The offense carries a mandatory three day jail sentence and a mandatory Class 7 license suspension of up to one year.  The judge has the discretion to allow the jail time to be served by a minimum of 30 days on Electronic Home Detention (house arrest).  In addition, if the car used in the offense belongs to the offender, a 30 day immobilization of the car and impoundment of plates is required.  Some courts will not consider granting limited driving privileges following this charge because they see the offense as a direct violation of “their” order.  If a court does grant privileges it must be with the restricted yellow plates.  The judge may, but does not have to, require an ignition interlock device.  

SECOND OFFENSE. A second offense violation of R.C. 4510.14 is a first degree misdemeanor (punishable by a maximum sentence of one year  in jail and a $2,500.00 fine).  The offense carries a mandatory ten day jail sentence and a mandatory Class 7 license suspension of up to one year.  The judge has the discretion to allow the jail time to be served by a minimum of 90 days on Electronic Home Detention (house arrest).  In addition, if the car used in the offense belongs to the offender, a 60 day immobilization of the car and impoundment of plates is required.  Most courts will not consider granting limited driving privileges following this charge because they see the offense as a direct violation of “their” order.  If a court does grant privileges it must be with the restricted yellow plates.  The judge may, but does not have to, require an ignition interlock device.  Be aware, a second violation can result in a very big bond being placed and may result in your being in jail until the case can be heard.

THIRD OFFENSE. A third driving under OVI suspension is an unclassified misdemeanor punishable by a maximum sentence of one year  in jail and a $2,500.00 fine.  The charge carries a mandatory minimum of 30 days in jail.  Unlike a first or second violation, Electronic Home Detention (house arrest) is not an option.  Forfeiture of the vehicle is required on a third offense, but the granting of driving privileges is still possible with restricted plates.

INTERESTING NOTES: Ohio has recently reformed its criminal sentencing statutes with the passage of H.B. 163.  H.B. 163 allows use of house arrest with continuous alcohol monitoring in OVI cases, but did not change the Driving Under OVI Suspension statute.  This may have been an oversight as it seems the legislature is attempting to help people keep their job following a DUI/OVI arrest.  Another interesting legal argument relates to the Class 7 (up to one year suspensions).  Since the language of the statute says “up to” does that mean that a judge could order a one day sentence? One hour?  Note that for multiple OVI offenders under suspension, the court may also impound the plates of any other vehicle owned by the offender.  Also note that a permanent loss of vehicle shall be ordered by the court, if, within five years you commit a first offense of driving a vehicle that is immobilized and plates impounded.

DUI attorney Charles M. Rowland II dedicates his practice to defending the accused drunk driver in FairbornDaytonSpringfieldKetteringVandaliaXeniaMiamisburgSpringboro,Huber HeightsOakwoodBeavercreekCenterville and throughout Ohio.  He has the credentials and the experience to win your case and has made himself the Miami Valley’s choice for DUI defense.  Contact Charles Rowland by phone at 937-318-1DUI (937-318-1384), 937-879-9542, or toll-free at 1-888-ROWLAND (888-769-5263).  For after-hours help contact our 24/7 DUI HOTLINE at 937-776-2671.  For information about Dayton DUI sent directly to your mobile device, text DaytonDUI (one word) to 50500.  Follow DaytonDUI on Twitter @DaytonDUI or Get Twitter updates via SMS by texting DaytonDUI to40404. DaytonDUI is also available on Facebook and on the DaytonDUI channel on YouTube.  You can also email Charles Rowland at: CharlesRowland@DaytonDUI.com or write to us at 2190 Gateway Dr., Fairborn, Ohio 45324. “All I do is DUI”

ALS Appeal: Refusal or Obstruction? (by Dayton DUI)

January 25th, 2013

Logo BlueOften, our clients will tell us that they could not produce a sufficient sample for the requested chemical test.  ”I kept trying, but I just could not blow long enough to satisfy the officer.”  If they hope that this information will prevent the imposition of an Administrative License Suspension, they may be disappointed.  Ohio DUI law sets a high bar for overcoming the presumption that law enforcement was not at fault for your failure.

The validity of a refusal based on physical incapacity to submit a sample requires a factual finding by the court in favor of the accused. Wilder v. McCulllion, 7 Ohio Misc. 2d 6, 453 N.E. 2d 1314 (Mun. Ct. 1983); Hecker v. McCullion, 1990 WL 4319 (Ohio Ct. App. 10th Dist. Franklin County 1990); Crasper v. Andrews, 1977 WL 201382 (Ohio Ct. App. 8th Dist. Cuyahoga County 1977).  To demonstrate that a genuine effort was made by the licensee to submit to testing, despite the inability to produce a valid test result, evidence that the testing device or process was defective or that the individual was physically incapable of producing a sufficient sample may be presented by the petitioner in challenging the administrative license suspension. See Weiler & Weiler, Ohio Driving Under The Influence Law, 2012-2013 ed., at 135 citing, Andrews v. Turner 52 Ohio St. 2d 31, 6 Ohio Op. 3d 149, 368 N.E.2d 1253 (1977); Hecker v. McCullion, 1990 WL 4319 (Ohio Ct. App. 10th Dist. Franklin County 1990); Hoffer-Hodge v. Caltridge, 1998 WL 906479 (Ohio Ct. App. 2nd Dist. Montgomery County 1998).

If you have a legitimate excuse for your failure to produce a sample, there is precedent that a court may find in you favor. See Fletcher v. Bureau of Motor Vehicles, 1985 WL 7130 (Ohio Ct. App. 6th Dist. Wood County 1985); State v. Hicks, 1984 WL 6294 (Ohio Ct. App. 11th Dist. Trumbull County 1984); Riebel v. Curry, 38 Ohio Misc. 71, 67 Ohio Op.2d 272, 313 N.E.2d 26 (Mun. Ct. 1974).  A physical inability to produce a urine sample has also been found not to be a refusal. Guckian v. Dollison, No. CA7169 (Ohio Ct. App. 2nd Dist. Montgomery County 7-29-81); Murphy v. McCullion, 1986 WL 10604 (Ohio Ct. App. 11th Dist. Trumbull County 1986); Trotwood v. Briggs, 64 Ohio Misc. 2d 34, 639 N.E.2d 876 (County Ct. 1994).  If you have a valid reason that the chemical test requested was difficult or impossible to comply with, your DUI attorney can present a defense at an Administrative License Suspension Appeal.  Make sure you tell your attorney of these issues at the initial consultation, as they will be required to be presented at the beginning of your case.

DUI attorney Charles M. Rowland II dedicates his practice to defending the accused drunk driver in Fairborn, Dayton, SpringfieldKetteringVandaliaXeniaMiamisburgHuber HeightsBeavercreekCentervilleSpringboro, Franklin and throughout Ohio.  He has the credentials and the experience to win your case and has made himself the Miami Valley’s choice for DUI defense.  Contact Charles Rowland by phone at 937-318-1DUI (937-318-1384), 937-879-9542, or toll-free at 1-888-ROWLAND (888-769-5263).  For after-hours help contact our 24/7 DUI HOTLINE at 937-776-2671.  For information about Dayton DUI sent directly to your mobile device, text DaytonDUI (one word) to 50500.  Follow DaytonDUI on Twitter @DaytonDUI or Get Twitterupdates via SMS by texting DaytonDUI to 40404. DaytonDUI is also available on Facebook,www.facebook.com/daytondui and on the DaytonDUI channel on YouTube.  You can also email Charles Rowland at: CharlesRowland@DaytonDUI.com or write to us at 2190 Gateway Dr., Fairborn, Ohio 45324.

Arrested at Wright-Patterson AFB?

January 22nd, 2013

English: C-5A 70-0448, 445th Operations Group ...

WE CAN HELP IF YOU ARE ARRESTED ON BASE

We have a former J.A.G. officer on staff to help with military DUI/OVI cases.  Located conveniently near Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Charles M. Rowland II has successfully represented active-duty military, contractors, and civilian employees for over 15 years.  He knows how to deal with issues of deployment, security clearances, loss of rank, loss of on-base driving privileges and issues related to out-of-state licenses.  If you find yourself arrested for OVI in or near Wright-Patterson Air Force Base and you will be required to appear in the United State Federal Court or the Fairborn Municipal Court contact Charles Rowland today.

Charles Rowland is licensed to practice in the State of Ohio and concentrates his  OVI, DUI and Drunk Driving practice in the following counties: Montgomery, Greene, Miami, Warren, Butler, Preble, Darke, Logan, Clinton, Shelby, Champaign, Clark, Clermont and Hamilton, Ohio. Charles Rowland practices in the following municipal courts: Kettering Municipal, Dayton Municipal, Montgomery County Area Courts One and Two, Trotwood and Huber Heights, Miamisburg Municipal, Vandalia Municipal, Xenia Municipal, Fairborn Municipal, Clark County Municipal, Troy Municipal, Franklin County Municipal, Hamilton County Municipal, Butler County Municipal Courts Area One Two and Three.

DUI attorney Charles M. Rowland II dedicates his practice to defending the accused drunk driver in Fairborn, Dayton, Springfield, Kettering, Vandalia, Xenia, Miamisburg, Springboro, Huber Heights, Oakwood, Beavercreek, Centerville and throughout Ohio.  He has the credentials and the experience to win your case and has made himself the Miami Valley’s choice for DUI defense.  Contact Charles Rowland by phone at 937-318-1DUI (937-318-1384), 937-879-9542, or toll-free at 1-888-ROWLAND (888-769-5263).  For after-hours help contact our 24/7 DUI HOTLINE at 937-776-2671.  For information about Dayton DUI sent directly to your mobile device, text DaytonDUI (one word) to 50500.  Follow DaytonDUI on Twitter @DaytonDUI or Get Twitter updates via SMS by texting DaytonDUI to 40404. DaytonDUI is also available on Facebook and on the DaytonDUI channel on YouTube.  You can also email Charles Rowland at: CharlesRowland@DaytonDUI.com or write to us at 2190 Gateway Dr., Fairborn, Ohio 45324. “All I do is DUI”