Ohio Criminal Law

License Plate Light Not Illuminated (O.R.C. 4513.05)

April 24th, 2013

In Ohio, it is illegal to operate a motor vehicle without a white light illuminating the rear registration plate. See O.R.C. 4513.05. This law is often used as a pretext for a traffic stop which allows the officer to come into contact with the motorist. Here is a full text of the law.

4513.05 Tail lights and illumination of rear license plate.

(A) Every motor vehicle, trackless trolley, trailer, semitrailer, pole trailer, or vehicle which is being drawn at the end of a train of vehicles shall be equipped with at least one tail light mounted on the rear which, when lighted, shall emit a red light visible from a distance of five hundred feet to the rear, provided that in the case of a train of vehicles only the tail light on the rearmost vehicle need be visible from the distance specified.

Either a tail light or a separate light shall be so constructed and placed as to illuminate with a white light the rear registration plate, when such registration plate is required, and render it legible from a distance of fifty feet to the rear. Any tail light, together with any separate light for illuminating the rear registration plate, shall be so wired as to be lighted whenever the headlights or auxiliary driving lights are lighted, except where separate lighting systems are provided for trailers for the purpose of illuminating such registration plate.

(B) Whoever violates this section is guilty of a minor misdemeanor.

While this may seem like a trifling reason for a traffic stop, most states have similar laws. The justification for the law is that a passerby or pedestrian who sees a car should be able to identify the car by its license plate. Arguing that your car has reflective license plates is not a defense. Once the officer comes in contact he can begin a full investigation for impaired driving if he establishes reasonable and articulable suspicion to continue the detention.

Why a white light? Law enforcement does not want the light to be able to change the color of the license plate and thus enhance the possibility of misidentification of a vehicle. We have also seen cases of individuals being pulled over due to neon flashing lights on their license plates. Ohio Revised Code, section 4513.17 prohibits flashing lights on motor vehicles with the exception of emergency vehicles, turn signals, and hazard flashers.Lights must not rotate, oscillate, or flash, but state law does not prohibit the use of colored neon lights under your car as long as they do not interfere or blind other drivers. As long as the neon lights are less than 300 candle power they are not in violation of any State law. If the lights are more than 300 candle power they must be directed to strike the pavement the vehicle sets upon at a distance of no more than 75 feet. The lights can not exceed 500 candle power. Colored lights, such as neon lights around a license plate, could be illegal if the light illuminates the plate and changes the colors of the plate. State law requires a white light to illuminate the rear license plate.”

If you have questions regarding the information provided above, please contact Charles M. Rowland II by phone at 937-318-1DUI (937-318-1384), 937-879-9542, or toll-free at 1-888-ROWLAND (1-888-769-5263).For after-hours help contact our 24/7 DUI HOTLINE at 937-776-2671. Immediate help is available by filling out the CONTACT form on any of these pages. For information about Dayton DUI sent directly to your mobile device, text DaytonDUI (one word) to 50500. Follow DaytonDUI on Twitter at www.Twitter.com/DaytonDUI or Get Twitterupdates via SMS by texting follow DaytonDUI to 40404. DaytonDUI is also available on Facebook and you can access updates by becoming a fan of Dayton DUI/OVI Defense. You can also email Charles Rowland at: CharlesRowland@DaytonDUI.com or write to us at 2190 Gateway Dr., Fairborn, Ohio 45324

No comments »

Posted in Ohio Criminal Law, Ohio Traffic Law

Ohio’s Open Container Law, O.R.C. 4301.62

March 15th, 2013

It is illegal to possess in public an open container of an alcoholic beverage. Conviction of this offense carries a maximum penalty of a $150 fine. Consumption of alcohol in a motor vehicle is a fourth-degree misdemeanor with maximum penalties of 30 days imprisonment or a $250 fine or both. If you are facing an OVI (drunk driving) charge, an open container or any other alcohol-related charge, please contact Charles M. Rowland II at (937) 318-1384 or visit www.DaytonDUI.com. Below is the full text of Ohio’s Open Container Law.

OPEN CONTAINER LAW

4301.62 Opened container of beer or intoxicating liquor prohibited at certain premises.

(A) As used in this section:
(1) “Chauffeured limousine” means a vehicle registered under section 4503.24 of the Revised Code.
(2) “Street,” “highway,” and “motor vehicle” have the same meanings as in section 4511.01 of the Revised Code.
(B) No person shall have in the person’s possession an opened container of beer or intoxicating liquor in any of the following circumstances:
(1) In a state liquor store;
(2) Except as provided in division (C) of this section, on the premises of the holder of any permit issued by the division of liquor control;
(3) In any other public place;
(4) Except as provided in division (D) or (E) of this section, while operating or being a passenger in or on a motor vehicle on any street, highway, or other public or private property open to the public for purposes of vehicular travel or parking;
(5) Except as provided in division (D) or (E) of this section, while being in or on a stationary motor vehicle on any street, highway, or other public or private property open to the public for purposes of vehicular travel or parking.
(C) A person may have in the person’s possession an opened container of any of the following:
(1)(a) Beer or intoxicating liquor that has been lawfully purchased for consumption on the premises where bought from the holder of an A-1-A, A-2, D-1, D-2, D-3, D-3a, D-4, D-4a, D-5, D-5a, D-5b, D-5c, D-5d, D-5e, D-5f, D-5g, D-5h, D-5i, D-5j, D-5k, D-7, D-8, E, F, F-2, or F-5 permit;
(b) Beer, wine, or mixed beverages served for consumption on the premises by the holder of an F-3 permit or wine served for consumption on the premises by the holder of an F-4 or F-6 permit;
(c) Beer or intoxicating liquor consumed on the premises of a convention facility as provided in section 4303.201 of the Revised Code;
(d) Beer or intoxicating liquor to be consumed during tastings and samplings approved by rule of the liquor control commission.
(2) A person may have in the person’s possession on an F liquor permit premises an opened container of beer or intoxicating liquor that was not purchased from the holder of the F permit if the premises for which the F permit is issued is a music festival and the holder of the F permit grants permission for that possession on the premises during the period for which the F permit is issued. As used in this division, “music festival” means a series of outdoor live musical performances, extending for a period of at least three consecutive days and located on an area of land of at least forty acres.
(3)(a) A person may have in the person’s possession on a D-2 liquor permit premises an opened orunopened container of wine that was not purchased from the holder of the D-2 permit if the premises for which the D-2 permit is issued is an outdoor performing arts center, the person is attending an orchestral performance, and the holder of the D-2 permit grants permission for the possession and consumption of wine in certain predesignated areas of the premises during the periodfor which the D-2 permit is issued.
(b) As used in division (C)(3)(a) of this section:
(i) “Orchestral performance” means a concert comprised of a group of not fewer than forty musicians playing various musical instruments.
(ii) “Outdoor performing arts center” means an outdoor performing arts center that is located on not less than eight hundred acres of land and that is open for performances from the first day of April to the last day of October of each year.
(D) This section does not apply to a person who pays all or a portion of the fee imposed for the use of a chauffeured limousine pursuant to a prearranged contract, or the guest of the person, when all of the following apply:
(1) The person or guest is a passenger in the limousine.
(2) The person or guest is located in the limousine, but is not occupying a seat in the front compartment of the limousine where the operator of the limousine is located.
(3) The limousine is located on any street, highway, or other public or private property open to the public for purposes of vehicular travel or parking.
(E) An opened bottle of wine that was purchased from the holder of a permit that authorizes the sale of wine for consumption on the premises where sold is not an opened container for the purposes of this section if both of the following apply:
(1) The opened bottle of wine is securely resealed by the permit holder or an employee of the permit holder before the bottle is removed from the premises. The bottle shall be secured in such a manner that it is visibly apparent if the bottle has been subsequently opened or tampered with.
(2) The opened bottle of wine that is resealed in accordance with division (E)(1) of this section is stored in the trunk of a motor vehicle or, if the motor vehicle does not have a trunk, behind the last upright seat or in an area not normally occupied by the driver or passengers and not easily accessible by the driver.

Effective Date: 04-07-2004; 09-21-2006

No comments »

Posted in Ohio Criminal Law, Ohio Traffic Law

Tags: 4301.62 Alcoholic beverage Beer charged with open container Charles M. Rowland charles rowland dayton criminal law dayton dui Dayton OVI Law Motor vehicle Ohio ohio criminal law ohio open container ohio traffic law ohio's open container law ohio's party rules Public space Recreation rules for partying United States open container laws

Ohio State Patrol To Enforce Dram Shop Laws

January 4th, 2013

Dram shop is a legal term referring to a bar where alcoholic beverages are sold. Traditionally, it referred to a shop where spirits were sold by the dram, a small unit of liquid. Dram shop laws which are designed to make business establishments liable for the injuries or damages caused by persons to whom they have sold alcohol. For example, if a bar or tavern sells alcohol to a patron, and that patron then injures someone in a car accident, the dram shop law allows the plaintiff to recover damages from the bar as well as the intoxicated person.

According to Ohio’s dram shop law, persons who were injured by an intoxicated person may have a cause of action against the business establishment who sold them the alcoholic beverage. The business’ liability depends somewhat on where the injury actually occurred:

· On the premises: If the injury occurred on the business owner’s premises, or in a parking lot under their control, the business owner will be held liable if the injury was caused by the negligence of the business or a business employee.

· Off premises: A business owner or employee may be held liable for injuries that occurred off premises if the establishment sold alcohol to a person who was visibly intoxicated, or if the person was a minor. These injuries may include automobile accidents as well as attacks or fist fights.

Starting this year, Ohio law enforcement officials will conduct investigations to determine where drunk drivers involved in accidents bought their alcohol and could file charges if the establishment served the driver too much. The Ohio Investigative Unit, formerly the Liquor Control Division, restructured and dedicated agents to those specific investigations involving liquor establishments that served drunk drivers involved in traffic crashes or any type of traffic stop involving a driver less than 21 years old. A local report on this new initiative can be found here and the video is below.

DUI attorney Charles M. Rowland II dedicates his practice to defending the accused drunk driver in Fairborn, Dayton, Springfield, Kettering, Vandalia, Xenia, Miamisburg, Huber Heights, Beavercreek, Centerville, Springboro, Franklin and throughout Ohio. He has the credentials and the experience to win your case and has made himself the Miami Valley’s choice for DUI defense. Contact Charles Rowland by phone at 937-318-1DUI (937-318-1384), 937-879-9542, or toll-free at 1-888-ROWLAND (888-769-5263). For after-hours help contact our 24/7 DUI HOTLINE at 937-776-2671. For information about Dayton DUI sent directly to your mobile device, text DaytonDUI (one word) to 50500. Follow DaytonDUI on Twitter @DaytonDUI or Get Twitterupdates via SMS by texting DaytonDUI to 40404. DaytonDUI is also available on Facebook,www.facebook.com/daytondui and on the DaytonDUI channel on YouTube. You can also email Charles Rowland at: CharlesRowland@DaytonDUI.com or write to us at 2190 Gateway Dr., Fairborn, Ohio 45324.

4 comments »

Posted in Ohio Criminal Law, Ohio Traffic Law

Tags: charles rowland dayton dui Dayton OVI dram shop dram shop law dramshop Driving under the influence drunk driving dui DUI attorney fairborn fairborn ohio huber heights ohio Miami Valley Ohio ohio dram shop law Ohio State Highway Patrol ovi OVI attorney state trooper underage driving YouTube

Snow: What is the Law in Ohio? (by DaytonDUI)

December 27th, 2012

With the return of winter weather, we have received some questions about what constitutes a snow emergency and under what authority a snow emergency can be deemed to exist. We have also counseled clients who wanted to know what law would circumscribe their behavior during a snow event. Here is what we learned:

A county sheriff may, pursuant to Ohio Revised Code sections 311.07 and 311.08, declare a snow emergency and temporarily close the state roads and municipal streets within his/her jurisdiction when such action is reasonably necessary for the preservation of the public peace. Ohio Attorney General’s Opinion 97-015, issued April 1, 1997, concluded that this authority includes state roads, county and township roads and municipal streets.

Ohio law provides for three levels of snow emergency.

Snow Emergency Classifications

LEVEL 1: Roadways are hazardous with blowing and drifting snow. Roads may also be icy. Motorists are urged to drive very cautiously.

LEVEL 2: Roadways are hazardous with blowing and drifting snow. Roads may also be very icy. Only those who feel it is necessary to drive should be out on the roads. Contact your employer to see if you should report to work. Motorists should use extreme caution.

LEVEL 3: All roadways are closed to non-emergency personnel. No one should be driving during these conditions unless it is absolutely necessary to travel or a personal emergency exists. All employees should contact their employer to see if they should report to work. Those traveling on the roads may subject themselves to arrest.

Ohio Revised Code 2917.13 sets forth the crime of “Misconduct at an Emergency.” Any person who knowingly hampers or fails to obey a lawful order of the sheriff declaring a snow emergency and temporarily closing highways, roads and/or streets within his/her jurisdiction may be subject to criminal prosecution under Ohio Revised Code Section 2917.13, “Misconduct at an emergency” or other applicable law or ordinance. A violation under that section is a misdemeanor of the fourth degree, punishable by a jail sentence not to exceed 30 days and/or a fine not to exceed $250. If the misconduct creates a risk of physical harm to persons or property, it is a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable by a jail sentence not to exceed 180 days and/or a fine not to exceed $1,000. Below is the full text of the statute.

ORC 2917.13. Misconduct at emergency.

(A) No person shall knowingly do any of the following:

1. Hamper the lawful operations of any law enforcement officer, firefighter, rescuer, medical person, emergency medical services person, or other authorized person, engaged in the person’s duties at the scene of a fire, accident, disaster, riot or emergency of any kind;

2. Hamper the lawful activities of any emergency facility person who is engaged in the person’s duties in an emergency facility;

3. Fail to obey the lawful order of any law enforcement officer engaged in the law enforcement officer’s duties at the scene of or in connection with a fire, accident, disaster or emergency of any kind.

(B) Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit access or deny information to any news media representative in the lawful exercise of the news media representative’s duties.

(C) Whoever violates this section is guilty of misconduct at an emergency. Except as otherwise provided in this division, misconduct at an emergency is a misdemeanor of the fourth degree. If a violation of this section creates a risk of physical harm to persons or property, misconduct at an emergency is a misdemeanor of the first degree.

(D) As used in this section:

1. “Emergency medical services person” is the singular of “emergency medical services personnel” as defined in section 2133.21 of the Revised Code.

2. “Emergency facility person” is the singular of “emergency facility personnel” as defined in section 2909.04 of the Revised Code.

3. “Emergency facility” has the same meaning as in section 2909.04 of the Revised Code.

Effective Date: 03-22-2004

To view the state’s weather-related road closures and restrictions, visit the Ohio Department of Transportation’s traffic Web site at www.buckeyetraffic.org.

DUI attorney Charles M. Rowland II dedicates his practice to defending the accused drunk driver in Fairborn, Dayton, Springfield, Kettering, Vandalia, Xenia, Miamisburg, Springboro, Huber Heights, Oakwood, Beavercreek, Centerville and throughout Ohio. He has the credentials and the experience to win your case and has made himself the Miami Valley’s choice for DUI defense. Contact Charles Rowland by phone at 937-318-1DUI (937-318-1384), 937-879-9542, or toll-free at 1-888-ROWLAND (888-769-5263). For after-hours help contact our 24/7 DUI HOTLINE at 937-776-2671. For information about Dayton DUI sent directly to your mobile device, text DaytonDUI (one word) to 50500. Follow DaytonDUI on Twitter @DaytonDUI or Get Twitter updates via SMS by texting DaytonDUI to 40404. DaytonDUI is also available on Facebook and on the DaytonDUI channel on YouTube. You can also email Charles Rowland at: CharlesRowland@DaytonDUI.com or write to us at 2190 Gateway Dr., Fairborn, Ohio 45324. “All I do is DUI”

No comments »

Posted in Holiday Messages, Ohio Criminal Law, Ohio Traffic Law

Tags: 4511.20 arrested for dui beavercreek dui beavercreek dui attorney beavercreek dui defense beavercreek dui lawyer beavercreek ovi beavercreek ovi attorney beavercreek ovi lawyer Beavercreek speeding ticket Beavercreek traffic attorney Beavercreek traffic lawyer Beavercreek traffic ticket charles rowland dayton dui dayton dui attorney dayton dui defense Dayton DUI Defense Firm dayton dui law dayton dui lawyer Dayton Ohio Dayton OVI dayton ovi attorney dayton ovi lawyer Dayton speed defense Dayton speeding ticket dayton traffic attorney dayton traffic lawyer Driving under the influence drunk driving dui DUI attorney dui law DUI Lawyer excessive speed fairborn dui fairborn dui attorney fairborn dui defense fairborn dui lawyer fairborn ovi fairborn ovi attorney fairborn ovi lawyer Fairborn traffic attorney Fairborn traffic lawyer huber heights dui huber heights dui attorney huber heights dui defense huber heights dui lawyer huber heights ovi huber heights ovi attorney huber heights ovi lawyer huber heights speeding ticket huber heights traffic attorney huber heights traffic lawyer interstate 70 speeding ticket interstate 75 speeding ticket kettering dui kettering dui attorney kettering dui defense kettering dui law kettering dui lawyer kettering ovi kettering ovi attorney kettering ovi lawyer kettering speeding ticket kettering traffic attorney kettering traffic lawyer miami valley dui miami valley ovi Miami valley traffic attorney Miami valley traffic lawyer miamisburg dui miamisburg dui attorney miamisburg dui defense miamisburg dui law miamisburg dui lawyer Miamisburg ovi miamisburg ovi attorney miamisburg ovi lawyer Miamisburg speeding ticket Miamisburg traffic attorney Miamisburg traffic lawyer misconduct during an emergency Ohio ohio dui ohio dui attorney Ohio DUI Defense ohio dui law ohio dui lawyer ohio ovi ohio speeding offense ohio speeding ticket ohio traffic attorney ohio traffic lawyer ovi OVI attorney OVI lawyer R.C. 2917.13 Speed limit speed violation speeding attorney speeding lawyer speeding offense speeding ticket speeding ticket defense springboro dui springboro dui attorney springboro dui lawyer springboro ovi springboro ovi attorney springboro ovi lawyer springfield dui defense Springfield Ohio springfield ohio dui springfield ohio dui attorney springfield ohio dui law springfield ohio dui lawyer springfield ohio ovi springfield ohio ovi attorney springfield ohio ovi lawyer Springfield ohio speeding ticket springfield ohio traffic attorney Springfield ohio traffic lawyer Springfield ohio traffic ticket springfield ovi defense vandalia dui vandalia dui attorney vandalia dui defense vandalia dui lawyer vandalia ovi vandalia ovi attorney vandalia ovi lawyer Vandalia speeding ticket Vandalia traffic attorney Vandalia traffic lawyer xenia dui xenia dui attorney xenia dui defense xenia dui law xenia dui lawyer xenia ovi xenia ovi attorney xenia ovi lawyer xenia speeding ticket xenia traffic attorney xenia traffic lawyer xenia traffic ticket

Can A Defendant Waive A Jury Trial In Ohio? (by DaytonDUI)

December 19th, 2012

Controversial Jury Bill Dies In Committee

Ohio is one of 21 states that give the power to decide whether or not to have a jury trial solely to the defendant. Thus, a defendant can, at any point, decide against a jury trial and opt for a trial only to the judge. This is often done in serious OVI cases wherein a technical or scientific point is the most salient point. It is particularly apt when a defendant wants to avoid allowing the prosecution to enflame the jury with sympathetic evidence of injuries or in cases where the defendant has a lengthy criminal history. In short, it is one of very few tools that can (in very limited circumstances) benefit a criminal defendant. This benefit does not exist in the federal system. Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 23 states that a defendant may only waive a trial by jury with the consent of the prosecution. This provision has been upheld by the Supreme Court in Patton v. U.S. and Singer v. U.S.

Ohio State Rep. Lynn Slaby, a former prosecutor, introduced HB 265 last December to change Ohio law to make it consistent with federal law, and thus more beneficial to Ohio prosecutors. The Bill states, in pertinent part:

The prosecuting attorney, a village solicitor, a city director of law, or a similar chief legal officer for a municipal corporation responsible for prosecuting a criminal case before a municipal court may demand a jury trial in any criminal case in which a defendant may demand a jury trial. The prosecuting attorney, village solicitor, city director of law, or similar chief legal officer may demand a jury trial notwithstanding a defendant’s failure to demand a jury trial and over the objection of the defendant.(Emphasis added.)

From the beginning the bill was controversial and garnered little support outside of the prosecutors. ”This is the second time in nine years that the legislature has attempted to take away a defendant’s right to waive a jury trial; a right that simply levels the playing field for defendants in a game where the prosecution enjoys exclusive control over the nature of the charges filed, the number of charges brought, and execution of the charges through warrant and arrest. The last time, in 2002, the measure (H.B. 541) was squashed through the hard work of attorneys and judges who saw the danger in such legislation.” Columbus Bar Association, Fall 2011.

On Wednesday, December 12, the Ohio Senate Judiciary Committee held testimony on HB 265. After hearing testimony, Chairman Mark Wagoner did not call for a vote. This action by Chairman Wagoner effectively defeated the bill for this session. As of this writing it is unknown whether the bill will be reintroduced at a later date. We will keep you informed.

DUI attorney Charles M. Rowland II dedicates his practice to defending the accused drunk driver in Dayton, Springfield, Kettering, Vandalia, Xenia, Miamisburg, Huber Heights,Beavercreek, and throughout Ohio. He has the credentials and the experience to win your case and has made himself the Miami Valley’s choice for DUI defense. Contact Charles Rowland by phone at 937-318-1DUI (937-318-1384), 937-879-9542, or toll-free at 1-888-ROWLAND (888-769-5263). For after-hours help contact our 24/7 DUI HOTLINE at 937-776-2671. For information about Dayton DUI sent directly to your mobile device, text DaytonDUI (one word) to 50500. Follow DaytonDUI on Twitter @DaytonDUI or Get Twitter updates via SMS by texting DaytonDUI to 40404. DaytonDUI is also available on Facebook,www.facebook.com/daytondui and on the DaytonDUI channel on YouTube. You can also email Charles Rowland at: CharlesRowland@DaytonDUI.comor write to us at 2190 Gateway Dr., Fairborn, Ohio 45324.

4 comments »

Posted in DUI Case Law, DUI Court Process, Ohio Criminal Law

Tags: arrested for dui beavercreek dui beavercreek dui attorney beavercreek dui defense beavercreek dui lawyer beavercreek ovi beavercreek ovi attorney beavercreek ovi lawyer charles rowland Criminal law Criminal procedure dayton dui dayton dui attorney dayton dui defense Dayton DUI Defense Firm dayton dui law dayton dui lawyer Dayton Ohio Dayton OVI dayton ovi attorney dayton ovi lawyer Driving under the influence drunk driving dui DUI attorney dui law DUI Lawyer fairborn dui fairborn dui attorney fairborn dui defense fairborn dui lawyer fairborn ohio fairborn ovi fairborn ovi attorney fairborn ovi lawyer federal criminal law huber heights dui huber heights dui attorney huber heights dui defense huber heights dui lawyer huber heights ohio huber heights ovi huber heights ovi attorney huber heights ovi lawyer jury trial kettering dui kettering dui attorney kettering dui defense kettering dui law kettering dui lawyer kettering ovi kettering ovi attorney kettering ovi lawyer Mark Wagoner Miami Valley miami valley dui miami valley ovi miamisburg dui miamisburg dui attorney miamisburg dui defense miamisburg dui law miamisburg dui lawyer Miamisburg ovi miamisburg ovi attorney miamisburg ovi lawyer Ohio ohio criminal defense attorney ohio criminal defense lawyer ohio dui ohio dui attorney Ohio DUI Defense ohio dui law ohio dui lawyer ohio ovi ovi OVI attorney OVI lawyer right to a jury trial springboro dui springboro dui attorney springboro dui lawyer springboro ovi springboro ovi attorney springboro ovi lawyer springfield dui defense Springfield Ohio springfield ohio dui springfield ohio dui attorney springfield ohio dui law springfield ohio dui lawyer springfield ohio ovi springfield ohio ovi attorney springfield ohio ovi lawyer springfield ovi defense vandalia dui vandalia dui attorney vandalia dui defense vandalia dui lawyer vandalia ovi vandalia ovi attorney vandalia ovi lawyer xenia dui xenia dui attorney xenia dui defense xenia dui law xenia dui lawyer xenia ovi xenia ovi attorney xenia ovi lawyer YouTube

« Older Entries

Welcome to the Ohio DUI/OVI Blog
- I am a DUI/OVI attorney, representing the accused drunk driver in the Miami Valley and throughout Ohio. Here you will find information to fight your case and get your life back! You can talk with me right now, or arrange a free consultation by calling 937-318-1DUI or 1-888-ROWLAND. "ALL I DO IS DUI DEFENSE"
You are currently browsing the archives for the Ohio Criminal Law category.