QUESTION: Do the police have the right to take someone’s license at the time they are arrested for a DUI?
AUDIO ANSWER by DUI Attorney Charles Rowland:

QUESTION: Do the police have the right to take someone’s license at the time they are arrested for a DUI?
AUDIO ANSWER by DUI Attorney Charles Rowland:

It is not uncommon for a client to choose my representation on a second, third, or fourth OVI offense. One of the first things we check is whether or not the client was represented by an attorney in the previous convictions. We also check to see if the prior plea had a valid waiver of counsel. Both of these issues were addressed by the Ohio Supreme Court in State v. Brooke, 113 Ohio St. 3d 199, 2007-Ohio-1533, 863 N.E. 2d 1024 (2007), wherein the Court stated:
Generally, a past conviction cannot be attacked in a subsequent case. However, there is a limited right to collaterally attack a conviction when the state proposes to use the past conviction to enhance the penalty of a later criminal offense. A conviction obtained against the defendant who is without counsel, or its corollary, an uncounseled conviction obtained without a valid waiver of the right to counsel, has been recognized as constitutionally infirm.
The case law following State v. Brooke has led to many cases which result in client’s not having a subsequent OVI enhanced. This area of law is fact dependent and your attorney should make a thorough review of the law in your court and appellate district when pursuing this line of collateral attack. The Ohio Supreme Court has set forth precedent that it is the defendant’s responsibility and burden to make a prima facie showing of a defect in the prior plea. Upon this prima facie showing, the burden shifts to the state to rebut the evidence by showing that the plea did, in fact, contain a valid waiver of counsel. See State v. Thompson, 2007-Ohio-6098 (Ohio Ct. App. 5th Dist. Fairfield County 2007).
In 2007, the Ohio Legislature passed 2007 Am. Sub. S.B. 17 which added 2945.75(B)(3). The purpose of this law was to overrule the law set forth in State v. Brooke which required the defendant to raise a prima facie showing and instead, place on the defendant the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that the prior plea was infirm. As Judge Weiler points out in Ohio Driving Under The Influence Law, 2011-2012 ed., pp. 402, “It will undoubtedly be challenged in the future as a violation of procedural due process. But, it will be some time before the matter reaches the appellate level and even longer before it is reviewed by the Ohio Supreme Court.”
Dayton DUI attorney Charles M. Rowland II dedicates his practice to defending the accused drunk driver in Fairborn, Springfield, Kettering, Vandalia, Xenia, Miamisburg, Huber Heights, Beavercreek, Centerville, Springboro, Franklin and throughout Ohio. He has the credentials and the experience to win your case and has made himself the Miami Valley’s choice for DUI defense. Contact Charles Rowland by phone at 937-318-1DUI (937-318-1384), 937-879-9542, or toll-free at 1-888-ROWLAND (888-769-5263). For after-hours help contact our 24/7 DUI HOTLINE at 937-776-2671. For information about Dayton DUI sent directly to your mobile device, text DaytonDUI (one word) to 50500. Follow DaytonDUI on Twitter @DaytonDUI or Get Twitterupdates via SMS by texting DaytonDUI to 40404. DaytonDUI is also available on Facebook,www.facebook.com/daytondui and on the DaytonDUI channel on YouTube. You can also email Charles Rowland at: CharlesRowland@DaytonDUI.com or write to us at 2190 Gateway Dr., Fairborn, Ohio 45324.

What does a DUI defense cost? We encounter many people who want a rational, economic justification for hiring an OVI attorney on a first offense OVI. The only study I could find on this topic was a 2006 Texas Department of Transportation study which calculated the costs of a drunk driving conviction “in that state showed the total costs of a DWI arrest and conviction for a first-time offender with no accident involved would range from $9,000 to $24,000.” [source] In a story from CNBC citing that study, they speculate that total costs, absent you losing your job, could range as high as $20,000. While projecting costs without knowing your particular circumstance is wildly speculative, here are some of the expenses you may realize:
Obviously, if you were to lose your job and/or your career because of an Ohio OVI conviction, the lifetime costs skyrocket. Insurance premiums, damages caused by personal injury or costs of restitution for property damages also cause the costs to climb. Some of the expenses highlighted above can take years to come to fruition and the lingering effects of having a drunk driving conviction may be with you for life.
The good news is that a good DUI attorney can significantly curb the financial detriments incurred in a DUI case. While predicting what an attorney can save you is just as wildly speculative as predicting costs, it is common for many of the costs to be subject to negotiation and/or reduction. A reduction of the charge will not only lower the possible maximum fines, but can also get rid of ugly mandatory punishments required by Ohio’s OVI statute. O.R.C. 4511.19. The best way to explore how much a vigorous DUI defense will costs in your case, contact Charles M. Rowland for a free consultation. You will leave my office knowing exactly what I charge and how I arrived at that figure. Contact Charles Rowland by phone at 937-318-1DUI (937-318-1384), 937-879-9542, or toll-free at 1-888-ROWLAND (1-888-769-5263). For after-hours help contact our 24/7 DUI HOTLINE at 937-776-2671. We also hope that you will check out “How To Hire A DUI Attorney” on the main page of this blog.

There are a number of legal terms that apply to the government’s ability to take your stuff. Here is a guide to help you understand the different terms which may apply to your case.
1. Seizure. Your car may be subject to seizure at roadside at the time of your arrest under certain circumstances. The officer’s decision on whether or not to impound in an OVI arrest are governed by R.C. 4511.195. However, seizure of your vehicle is required for the following offenses,
2. Impoundment. R.C. 4511.19(G)(1)(d)(v) and R.C. 4511.19(G)(1)(e)(v) authorize a court, under certain conditions, to take a person’s license plates. Most of the time, impoundment is used pursuant to the issuance of “party plates” which are designed to shame and humiliate OVI offenders. If you are convicted of OVI in Ohio, yellow “restricted plates” are required,
In addition to the problems of living with the plates is the inconvenience of obtaining the plates. If you are required to use these plates, you must surrender your plates to the Bureau of Motor Vehicles who, in turn, will give you the restricted plates. The restricted plates must remain on your vehicle for the duration of any license suspension imposed by the court and/or during the duration of the administrative license suspension.
3. Immobilization. The temporary taking of your automobile is called immobilization. If you are convicted of a DUI and you have one prior conviction within six years, the judge will immobilize your vehicle for 90 days and impound its license plates. During the period of immobilization, the vehicle may not be driven or sold. Depending on the court, you may have to purchase a “club” and arrange for the car to be towed to your house or a secure location within the court’s jurisdiction. There is a “hardship” exception to this rule. A court may waive the immobilization requirement if a family or household member residing with the defendant is completely dependant on that vehicle for the necessities of life so that immobilization of the vehicle would be an undue hardship. If the immobilization requirement is waived by the court, the vehicle will be required to have restricted plates (yellow license plates) and must not be operated by the defendant.
4. Forfeiture. Forfeiture is the permanent surrender of your vehicle to the government. A third conviction within six (6) years, or a fifth conviction within twenty (20) years will result in the forfeiture of your vehicle. Frequent readers of this blog will note my numerous objections to this laws operation. The law does not have a provision to protect the credit or property interest of an innocent third party and works to create a great deal of harm to innocent people. No immobilization waiver is available for a third offense within six (6) years or a fifth within twenty (20) years.
DUI attorney Charles M. Rowland II dedicates his practice to defending the accused drunk driver in Fairborn, Dayton, Springfield, Kettering, Vandalia, Xenia, Miamisburg, Huber Heights, Beavercreek, Centerville, Springboro, Franklin and throughout Ohio. He has the credentials and the experience to win your case and has made himself the Miami Valley’s choice for DUI defense. Contact Charles Rowland by phone at 937-318-1DUI (937-318-1384), 937-879-9542, or toll-free at 1-888-ROWLAND (888-769-5263). For after-hours help contact our 24/7 DUI HOTLINE at 937-776-2671. For information about Dayton DUI sent directly to your mobile device, text DaytonDUI (one word) to 50500. Follow DaytonDUI on Twitter @DaytonDUI or Get Twitterupdates via SMS by texting DaytonDUI to 40404. DaytonDUI is also available on Facebook,www.facebook.com/daytondui and on the DaytonDUI channel on YouTube. You can also email Charles Rowland at: CharlesRowland@DaytonDUI.com or write to us at 2190 Gateway Dr., Fairborn, Ohio 45324.
