Trial Quotes

Happy Labor Day from Charles Rowland

September 5th, 2011
The Statue of Liberty front shot, on Liberty I...

Happy Labor Day!  My father started out in the Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen which became the United Transportation Union.  My Mom was a proud member of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME).   Without the good wages and benefits provided by their shared sacrifice, I could never have gone to college.  Charles M. Rowland II salutes America’s hard-working men and women and joins in our shared hopes that all who seek work can find a meaningful way to build the American Dream.

Happy Holidays from Dayton DUI

December 25th, 2010
A Christmas market in Clifton Mill, Ohio, Unit...
Image via Wikipedia

Happy holidays to Ohio’s fine Prosecuting Attorneys.  Every day they fight for justice and use the enormous power that they are given in a prudent and judicious manner.  Happy holidays to Ohio’s judges, who are the very embodiment of our evolving and ever-changing system of laws, norms and morals.  Most of all, happy holidays to Ohio’s law enforcement community.  They put their lives on the line so that all of us can enjoy our freedoms.  One cannot imagine the chaos and suffering that would be wrought were it not for these fine men and women.  As we open our gifts on Christmas morning, there is an officer somewhere doing an impossibly dangerous job and doing it with dignity and a respect for the perpetrator that will never be reciprocated.  I did not want to let this season pass without offering this sincere and oft-overlooked sentiment… Thank you.

-Charles M. Rowland II-

Enhanced by Zemanta

How Can You Defend Drunk Drivers?

October 13th, 2010

DUI Defense Attorney Quote of the Week

[T]he answer to the question, “How can you represent someone if you know they are guilty?” is “Easily and with a clear conscience.” Every time I did my best for anyone charged with a crime I was helping to maintain one of the greatest systems of justice ever devised.”

-Phillip Margolin-

Enhanced by Zemanta

Thomas Jefferson on “Separation between Church and State”

October 1st, 2010
Cropped version of Thomas Jefferson, painted b...
Image via Wikipedia

“Because religious belief, or non-belief, is such an important part of every person’s life, freedom of religion affects every individual. Religious institutions that use government power in support of themselves and force their views on persons of other faiths, or of no faith, undermine all our civil rights. Moreover, state support of an established religion tends to make the clergy unresponsive to their own people, and leads to corruption within religion itself. Erecting the “wall of separation between church and state,” therefore, is absolutely essential in a free society.

We have solved, by fair experiment, the great and interesting question whether freedom of religion is compatible with order in government and obedience to the laws. And we have experienced the quiet as well as the comfort which results from leaving every one to profess freely and openly those principles of religion which are the inductions of his own reason and the serious convictions of his own inquiries.”

– Thomas Jefferson, to the Virginia Baptists (1808) ME 16:320. This is his second kown use of the term “wall of separation,” here quoting his own use in the Danbury Baptist letter. This wording of the original was several times upheld by the Supreme Court as an accurate description of the Establishment Clause: Reynolds (98 US at 164, 1879); Everson (330 US at 59, 1947); McCollum (333 US at 232, 1948)

Enhanced by Zemanta

Ohio OVI Defense Attorney Quote of the Week

September 16th, 2010

United States Supreme Court Justice Byron White in the landmark case of United States vs. Wade, 388 U.S. 218 (1967)

“Law enforcement officers have the obligation to convict the guilty and to make sure they do not convict the innocent. They must be dedicated to making the criminal trial a procedure for the ascertainment of the true facts surrounding the commission of the crime. To this extent, our so-called adversary system is not adversary at all; nor should it be. But defense counsel has no comparable obligation to ascertain or present the truth. Our system assigns him a different mission. He must be and is interested in preventing the conviction of the innocent, but, absent a voluntary plea of guilty, we also insist that he defend his client whether he is innocent or guilty. The State has the obligation to present the evidence. Defense counsel need present nothing, even if he knows what the truth is. He need not furnish any witnesses to the police, or reveal any confidences of his client, or furnish any other information to help the prosecution’s case. If he can confuse a witness, even a truthful one, or make him appear at a disadvantage, unsure or indecisive, that will be his normal course. Our interest in not convictingthe innocent permits counsel to put the State to its proof, to put the State’s case in the worst possible light, regardless of what he thinks or knows to be the truth. Undoubtedly there are some limits which defense counsel must observe but more often than not, defense counsel will cross-examine a prosecution witness, and impeach him if he can, even if he thinks the witness is telling the truth, just as he will attempt to destroy a witness who he thinks is lying. In this respect, as part of our modified adversary system and as part of the duty imposed on the most honorable defense counsel, we countenance or require conduct which in many instances has little, if any, relation to the search for truth.”

Enhanced by Zemanta