Posts Tagged ‘dayton dui defense’

Commercial Driver’s License Disqualification in Ohio

May 4th, 2012
English: A sign that states "No Texting W...

You will lose your Ohio CDL for one year if convicted of any of the following offenses:

  • Driving any vehicle with a blood alcohol count (BAC) of 0.08% or higher
  • Driving a commercial motor vehicle (CMV) with a BAC of 0.04%
  • Refusing to submit to a sobriety test
  • Leaving the scene of an accident
  • Using the vehicle to commit a felony
  • Driving a commercial motor vehicle (CMV) with a suspended, revoked or canceled CDL
  • Causing a fatality through negligent driving

Serious Offenses, These violations include:

  • Speeding 15 mph over the posted speed limit
  • Reckless driving
  • Improper lane changes
  • Following a vehicle too closely
  • Driving a CMV without holding a CDL
  • Driving a CMV without having your CDL in your possession
  • Driving a CMV without the proper CDL endorsement
  • Violating a state law of texting while driving

A second conviction of any combination of these violations will lead to the loss of your driving privileges for 60 days, or 120 days for a third or subsequent conviction of any combination of these offenses.  If you plan to fight your traffic ticket, Legal counsel will improve your chances for a favorable decision. This could mean reduced charges or ticket dismissal, possibly sparing you of points, the possible suspension of your Ohio driver’s license and increased auto insurance rates.

DUI attorney Charles M. Rowland II dedicates his practice to defending the accused drunk driver in Fairborn, Dayton, Springfield, Kettering, Vandalia, Xenia, Miamisburg, Springboro, Huber Heights, Oakwood, Beavercreek, Centerville and throughout Ohio.  He has the credentials and the experience to win your case and has made himself the Miami Valley’s choice for DUI defense.  Contact Charles Rowland by phone at 937-318-1DUI (937-318-1384), 937-879-9542, or toll-free at 1-888-ROWLAND (888-769-5263).  For after-hours help contact our 24/7 DUI HOTLINE at 937-776-2671.  For information about Dayton DUI sent directly to your mobile device, text DaytonDUI (one word) to 50500.  Follow DaytonDUI on Twitter @DaytonDUI or Get Twitter updates via SMS by texting DaytonDUI to 40404. DaytonDUI is also available on Facebook and on the DaytonDUI channel on YouTube.  You can also email Charles Rowland at: CharlesRowland@DaytonDUI.com or write to us at 2190 Gateway Dr., Fairborn, Ohio 45324. “All I do is DUI

Arrested for DUI? What Can You Do Now To Protect, Educate and Empower Yourself

May 3rd, 2012
Speedcuffs Handcuffs Rear Back Behind Handcuff...

What do I do now?  Being arrested for DUI is a frightening and traumatic experience.  Our clients often struggle to deal with the stigma and shame associated with a DUI arrest.  Many strong people are brought to tears when telling a loved-one about their arrest.  Complicating matters is a palpable sense that everything is spinning out of control.  Charles Rowland and the staff at DaytonDUI have been helping people through this process for over seventeen years.  We want to reassure you that your DUI case can be successfully managed.  Like any other crisis, it is imperative that you take steps to PROTECT YOURSELF, EDUCATE YOURSELF and EMPOWER YOURSELF.  Below are some helpful steps that you can take to begin the process of putting a DUI arrest in perspective.

1. PROTECT YOURSELF

As soon as possible after your arrest, take time to write down every single detail of that you can remember.  Sometimes critical pieces of a defense can be found in details that may be forgotten if not recorded immediately.  Start with a time-line or chronology.  What were you doing prior to drinking? When did you start drinking?  How was your health in general on that day?  Did you work out earlier in the day?  Were you around any chemicals?  When did you last sleep?  What do you remember watching on television that day?  Did you make any cell phone calls or have text chats?  When did you last eat and what was it?  What cologne or aftershave lotion did you use that day?  What kind of shoes were your wearing?  Other important areas of consideration include what medications or drugs you ingested prior to driving.  Do you take prescription medication? Do you regularly smoke cigarettes or marijuana?  Did you use breath spray or tic-tacs or tobacco?  Who did you see that day?  Could you have visited a store with a video surveillance camera?  Do you know the bartender who served you?  How was your car operating that night or day?  Think of this first step as establishing what happened before you came in contact with law enforcement.

Next comes the “during arrest information.”  Yes, it may be painful, but try to write down everything that you can remember when you were stopped by law enforcement.  When did you first notice the officer following you?  What was your reaction?  Were you using a cell phone or texting (which may explain swerving), or were you oblivious to the officer until he turned his lights on.  Did you have anything in your mouth?  Often, the location of your stop can provide powerful assistance to your attorney.  Was it a busy road?  What were the conditions?  Was the roadway wet, slick, slanted, pot-holed?  Your memory may tempt you to focus on the administration of the standardized field sobriety tests, but many law enforcement decisions are made prior to asking you to step from the car.  The officer writes these important details in his report.  Make sure your attorney knows your version of events.  Remembering what you and the officer said is vital to establishing your defense.  Details of what happened at the station are also important.  How long were you in the cruiser?  How many officers were on the scene?  Who, if anyone, searched your car?  At the station, where were you placed prior to the test?  What, if anything, was read to you by the officer?  Try to be as precise as possible and write down exact quotes when you remember them.  Another way to protect yourself is to take pictures of your car and of the location of the stop.  The location may be vital in any number of ways in establishing the validity of the field tests and may possibly explain your driving habits on that roadway.  If the officer alleges that your tail light was out, or that your license plate light was inoperable, pictures taken shortly after the incident may exonerate you.

Do not drive!  If your license has been suspended you should protect yourself by arranging for transportation for at least two weeks.  Taking a taxi, or the bus, or just huffing it is less cumbersome than an additional charge of driving under a DUI suspension which carries additional mandatory jail time in Ohio.  You should also find out what ramifications will take place at your job.  If you have a CDL, you cannot drive under the CDL until the charges are resolved.  Active-duty military personnel also have obligations which may prove difficult without a license.  Losing your right (it’s not a privilege in my opinion) to drive is terrible.  It is my opinion that, to many people, the pre-conviction suspension is the worst punishment that they will incur in the entirety of this experience.  Address your particular situation with a qualified and competent DUI attorney.

Reasonable doubt comes from the recollection of events in a coherent and believable manner.  Protect yourself by taking the time to record what happened and by acting responsibly.

2. EDUCATE YOURSELF

DaytonDUI.com was started with the intent that you could find reliable information that would allow you to evaluate your case and choose an attorney.  Education about your charge will make you better equipped to find the attorney that is right for you.  A good place to start is the article “How to Hire a DUI Attorney” [linked HERE].  Ask everyone you know if they have had good or bad experiences with a particular attorney.  Talk to attorneys on the phone.  Meet with them in person.  Educate yourself about the particular court that you are going to, and the prosecutor, and the location of the court.  Check the credentials of the DUI attorneys in your area. [See HERE for a biography of Charles M. Rowland] Sometimes the scariest part of your DUI experience will be not knowing what the court process is like.  Good attorneys will try to help you by answering your questions and not trying to take advantage of your vulnerability at this critical time.  [See HERE for a video of Charles M. Rowland II explaining the Court Process].

My dad always said, “If you know how somebody gets paid, you’ll never get ripped off.”  Have a discussion with potential attorneys about how they expect to get paid and what you can expect for that service.  Ask who will be handling your case; will it be the attorney you are meeting with or an associate.  Ask how many cases they have tried in that court and whether or not they will listen to what you want.  One-size fits all is great from some things, but not for legal services.  Take control and get what you pay for.  Educate your self about your circumstances and your options so that the DUI experience is less traumatic.

3. EMPOWER YOURSELF

Some people come to my office, drop the ticket on my desk and expect me to take care of it.  Others want to understand every aspect of a DUI case from beginning to end.  I will work to make sure that you are taken care of in a manner that meets your expectations.  I will conform to what you need your attorney to be.  Now is not the time to retreat into yourself, but you must call on your inner champion to make the best decisions possible under the circumstances.  Everything we do at DaytonDUI is designed to provide you with a sense that your case is going to be handled to the best of our ability.  We have a great staff, good on-line and printed material, the best DUI library around and a proven track record.  We want you to win your case and put a bad experience behind you.  If you want to find out more, please check our blog or call Charles M. Rowland II at 937-318-1384 or 1-888-ROWLAND.

“Strength does not come from winning. Your struggles develop your strengths. When you go through hardships and decide not to surrender, that is strength.” -Arnold Schwarzenneger-

Invalid Consent Leads To Exclusion Of Blood Test

April 30th, 2012

Back of an Ambulance

If your DUI case involves an automobile accident, you may be taken to the hospital.  In this setting it is likely that an investigating officer will request a sample of your blood.  Frequently, the issue of consent will be raised.  Your Ohio DUI lawyer can challenge the validity of the consent and whether or not the consent was made knowingly and voluntarily.  These issues were recently addressed in State v. Rawnsley, 2011-Ohio-5696.

On April 24, 2010, Defendant Ann Rawnsley was involved in a two-car accident which resulted in sufficient injuries that she was removed to Miami Valley Hospital by ambulance.  Injuries to the other driver were so serious that Rawnsley was charged with aggravated vehicular assault.  An officer followed her to the hospital to continue the investigation that began at the scene.  The officer had gathered sufficient evidence to believe that Ms. Rawnsley may be driving while impaired by alcohol.  Without consent, a blood draw requires probable cause and either a warrant, or exigent circumstances justifying a search without a warrant.  Thus, if the defendant were under arrest, the consent for a chemical test of their blood breath or urine is presumed.  The “implied consent” statute specifies that: “Any person who operates a vehicle * * * within this state * * * shall be deemed to have given consent to a chemical test or tests of the person’s whole blood, * * * breath, or urine to determine the alcohol * * * content * * * if arrested for a violation of division (A) or (B) of R.C. 4511.19.” R.C. 4511.191 (emphasis added). If Rawnsley had been arrested, it would not  be necessary to engage in a Fourth Amendment consent-to-search analysis – she would have been deemed to have consented, and would have had no constitutional right to refuse.  Here, however, the evidence adduced at the motion to suppress demonstrated that the police officer never placed Rawnsley under arrest.  Instead, the officer was following departmental policy not to arrest a person who is being admitted to the hospital.

At the hospital, a police officer read to the defendant an Ohio BMV form that informed the defendant of the consequences of consenting to a blood test and refusing a blood test.  ”The provision for an immediate suspension of a driver’s license upon refusal to submit to a chemical test is contained in R.C. 4511.191(B)(1). This provision, like the implied consent, itself, is expressly predicated upon the fact that the person who is subject to the suspension has been arrested for Operating a Vehicle while Under the Influence. There is no provision for an automatic suspension-upon-refusal for a person, like Rawnsley, who has not beenarrested for OVI.” Id. at p. 19.  When the officer told Rawnsley that she would be “subject to an immediate, automatic driver’s license suspension if she did not consent to the blood draw, that was not true. Because Rawnsley was misadvised by the police officer that there would be a serious adverse consequence if she decided not to waive her Fourth Amendment right (not to be subjected to a warrantless search) and consent to the blood draw, her consent and concomitant waiver was not knowing and intelligent. See State v. Rice (1998), 129 Ohio App.3d 91.

In Schmerber v. California (1966), 384 U.S. 757, 86 S.Ct. 1826, 16 L.Ed.2d 908, the Supreme Court of the United States held that the taking of a blood specimen for the purpose of testing it for blood alcohol concentration is permitted without a warrant if there is probable cause and if there are exigent circumstances.  Here, the officer “admitted [he] did not consider making any effort to obtain a warrant.” Rawnsley. at p. 25.  The Court ruled that the police in order to establish an exigent circumstance, had the obligation, particularly since the collision occurred not in the early morning hours but at approximately 10:55 p.m., to draft a probable cause affidavit and attempt to reach a judge, or to at least explain why this was not practical. If, after a good faith effort, such an attempt was unavailing, the court, without hesitation, would conclude that exigent circumstances existed. However, without such an attempt, or any explanation concerning why such an attempt was not practical, the court concluded that exigent circumstances did not exist.

DUI attorney Charles M. Rowland II dedicates his practice to defending the accused drunk driver in DaytonSpringfieldKetteringVandaliaXenia,MiamisburgSpringboroHuber HeightsOakwoodBeavercreekCenterville and throughout Ohio.  He has the credentials and the experience to win your case and has made himself the Miami Valley’s choice for DUI defense.  Contact Charles Rowland by phone at 937-318-1DUI (937-318-1384), 937-879-9542, or toll-free at 1-888-ROWLAND (888-769-5263).  For after-hours help contact our 24/7 DUI HOTLINE at 937-776-2671.  For information about Dayton DUI sent directly to your mobile device, text DaytonDUI (one word) to 50500.  Follow DaytonDUI on Twitter @DaytonDUI or Get Twitter updates via SMS by texting DaytonDUI to40404. DaytonDUI is also available on Facebook and on the DaytonDUI channel on YouTube.  You can also email Charles Rowland at:CharlesRowland@DaytonDUI.com or write to us at 2190 Gateway Dr., Fairborn, Ohio 45324.

Forensic Blood Tests: Whole Blood vs. Serum/Plasma

April 26th, 2012

English: Bags of blood collected during donati...Ohio Administrative Code 3701-53-03(A) sets forth the techniques and methods for determining the concentration of alcohol in blood, urine and other bodily substances.  Pursuant to that rule, Ohio allows for testing including gas chromatography and enzyme assays.  To challenge a blood test, it is important to know if the State has tested the blood as whole blood or as serum/plasma.  Operation with a concentration of alcohol is prohibited if the concentration in whole blood is equal to or exceeds .08%, R.C. 4511.19(A)(1)(b).  However, the prohibited concentration for whole blood is a concentration equal to or exceeding .096%, R.C.4511.19(A)(1)(c).  The high teir (super-OVI) standard for whole blood is greater than .17% and the prohibited level for blood serum or plasma is greater than .204%.  If your attorney does not understand the difference between a whole blood and a serum/plasma test, he or she may give incorrect advise based on an incorrect assumption.  Secondly, studies suggest that plasma and serum tests can be 16 to 21 percent higher than whole blood tests (Taylor, 2000; Fitzgerald, 1999).  If the report that you receive from the Crime Lab does not specify whether whole blood or serum was tested, consider making a request for independent testing of the sample.

The Ohio rules for collection of blood specimens are set forth at Ohio Administrative Code 3701-53-05.  In State v. Meyers, 146 Ohio App.3d 563, 2001-Ohio-2282 (3d Dist. Allen County 2001), the court allowed the state to use a blood tests that were taken for diagnostic and treatment purposes so long as the tests are in compliance with the OAC regulations.  In State v. Gordon, 2002-Ohio-2140 (Ohio Ct. App. 8th Dist Cuyahoga County 2002) the Eight District Court of Appeals upheld the suppression of a blood draw when the State’s toxicologist did not testify regarding the conversion of the serum alcohol content to a whole blood concentration, nor did the toxicologist testify as to any laboratory procedures for testing blood serum content and converting the results to that of whole blood. See Weiler & Weiler, Ohio Driving Under the Influence, pp. 195-201.

DUI attorney Charles M. Rowland II dedicates his practice to defending the accused drunk driver in Dayton and throughout the Miami Valley.  He has the credentials and the experience to win your case and has made himself the Miami Valley’s choice for DUI defense.  Contact Charles Rowland by phone at 937-318-1DUI (937-318-1384), 937-879-9542, or toll-free at 1-888-ROWLAND (888-769-5263).  For after-hours help contact our 24/7 DUI HOTLINE at 937-776-2671.  For information about Dayton DUI sent directly to your mobile device, text DaytonDUI (one word) to 50500.  Follow DaytonDUI on Twitter@DaytonDUI or Get Twitter updates via SMS by texting DaytonDUI to 40404. DaytonDUI is also available on Facebookwww.facebook.com/daytondui and on the DaytonDUI channel on YouTube.  You can also email Charles Rowland at: CharlesRowland@DaytonDUI.com or write to us at 2190 Gateway Dr., Fairborn, Ohio 45324.

 

Related articles

Driving While High?

April 25th, 2012
3D rendering of the THC molecule

3D rendering of the THC molecule

Today, 90 million Americans have the right to access medical marijuana when they are seriously ill.  Ohioans will consider the passage of a medical marijuana bill this fall.  As more states decriminalize and legalize marijuana, law enforcement is scrambling to deal with what it warns will be a dramatic increase in driving while stoned.  What can we expect?

LAW ENFORCEMENT RESPONSE. Many states have adopted a specified training regimen for law enforcement officers.  This protocol allows officers to testify as to specific observations of marijuana impairment.  Drug Recognition Experts (DRE) are trained to recognize when an individual has been driving under the influence of drugs and to identify the type of drug causing impairment.  Drug Recognition Expert (DRE) refers not only to the officers themselves, but to the 12-step procedure that these officers use. DRE was developed by police officers from the Los Angeles (California) Police Department. In 1979, the Drug Recognition program received the official recognition of the LAPD. As of 2005, approximately 6000 police officers are certified as Drug Recognition Experts.  Ohio has not adopted the DRE protocol… yet.

STATUTORY RESPONSE. Several states, including Arizona, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, South Dakota, and Utah have adopted a “zero tolerance” approach to marijuana impairment while driving. Other states including Ohio, Pennsylvania and Nevada have attempted to set arbitrary levels which presume impairment.  These laws are similar to the familiar drunk driving laws which set a limit of .08% BAC.  Ohio, which also imposes a limit of 2 ng/mL for THC blood tests, and 10 ng/mL for THC urine tests. For the marijuana metabolite THC-COOH, Ohio’s limit is 50 ng/mL in blood and 35 ng/mL in urine; the limits are lower if the metabolite is detected along with alcohol or other drugs.

SCIENTIFIC RESPONSE.  As reported in this Reuters story, scientists are hard at work developing a roadside test for drivers who are impaired by marijuana.  It may soon be economically feasible to test drivers by using a quick saliva test which detects the presence of THC, the psychoactive ingredient in pot.   The saliva THC test is in its final phases of testing.

DUI attorney Charles M. Rowland II dedicates his practice to defending the accused drunk driver in DaytonSpringfieldKetteringVandaliaXenia,MiamisburgSpringboroHuber HeightsOakwoodBeavercreekCenterville and throughout Ohio.  He has the credentials and the experience to win your case and has made himself the Miami Valley’s choice for DUI defense.  Contact Charles Rowland by phone at 937-318-1DUI (937-318-1384), 937-879-9542, or toll-free at 1-888-ROWLAND (888-769-5263).  For after-hours help contact our 24/7 DUI HOTLINE at 937-776-2671.  For information about Dayton DUI sent directly to your mobile device, text DaytonDUI (one word) to 50500.  Follow DaytonDUI on Twitter @DaytonDUI or Get Twitter updates via SMS by texting DaytonDUI to40404. DaytonDUI is also available on Facebook and on the DaytonDUI channel on YouTube.  You can also email Charles Rowland at:CharlesRowland@DaytonDUI.com or write to us at 2190 Gateway Dr., Fairborn, Ohio 45324.