Ohio Revised Code 4511.19(D)(4)(b) sets forth the standards for admissibility of the results of field sobriety tests in OVI (drunk driving) prosecutions. See State v. Bozcar, 113 Ohio St. 3d 148, 2007-Ohio-1251, 863 N.E.2d 115 (2007). In order for the tests to be admissible, the State must demonstrate:
[Read the full post. . .]
- By clear and convincing evidence.
- The Officer administered the tests insubstantial compliance.
- The testing standards for any reliable, credible, and generally accepted test.
- Including, but not limited to,
Some Ohio courts have upheld determinations that the mere presence of a moderate to strong odor of alcohol, coupled with a proper initial stop, is sufficient to justify the administration of field sobriety tests. See, e.g., State v. Tackett, 2d Dist. No. 2011-CA-15, 2011-Ohio-6711 (“[t]his court has, however, repeatedly held that a strong odor of alcohol alone is sufficient to provide an officer with reasonable suspicion of criminal behavior”). See also State v. Schott, 2d Dist. [Read the full post. . .]
Protecting You From Illegal Police Stops!
The Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution protects you against unreasonable searches and seizures, which includes being unlawfully or illegally pulled over or stopped by law enforcement. An officer cannot simply pull you over based on a hunch or intuition. When a police officer observes a traffic violation, he or she is justified in initiating a limited stop for the purpose of issuing a citation. State v. Brickman(2001), 11th Dist. No. [Read the full post. . .]
This month, Charles M. Rowland II was re-certified as Ohio’s only DUI attorney credentialed in Forensic Sobriety Assessment. “FSA certification requires working knowledge of the scientific principles and research relating to sobriety testing in a DWI / DUI stop, including:
[Read the full post. . .]
- The scientific literature on indications of intoxication such as red eyes and slurred speach
- NHTSA’s Standardized Field Sobriety Tests (SFSTs)
- Testing concepts: Reliability and validity
- Diagnostic statistics: False positive rates, sensitivity, specificity, etc.
- Experimental design issues relevant to sobriety test
Dayton DUI defense attorney Charles M. Rowland II has earned certification in the administration and evaluation of standardized field sobriety tests by attending the Standardized Field Sobriety Testing Certification Student Course (NHTSA Course). This training course certified Charles Rowland in the most current NHTSA approved SFST training curriculum. This is the same NHTSA SFST training course that law enforcement officers are trained in nationwide and testify to in court.
Certified attorneys are trained in: Perspectives on recognizing driving [Read the full post. . .]